tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post2281030989753866861..comments2024-01-15T09:53:40.089-05:00Comments on Black Aces: Draft ChatterJeremy Milkshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09719907099819957578noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post-4851060072351572392011-04-14T21:22:57.164-04:002011-04-14T21:22:57.164-04:00Minus the "kitchen sink" guy, this is th...Minus the "kitchen sink" guy, this is the most intelligent comment section I have seen to date...glad to see most people think logically...stay pat Murray!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post-5702148805174183392011-04-14T20:55:40.882-04:002011-04-14T20:55:40.882-04:00If Landeskog is the blue chip propect the organiza...If Landeskog is the blue chip propect the organization has identified, I would want BM "to throw the kitchen sink at the Panthers in order to get that 3rd pick."<br /><br />BM could package both first round picks (#6 and #21) to the Panthers in return for their first round and second round picks (#3 and #33).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post-57072624381922911512011-04-14T15:31:02.669-04:002011-04-14T15:31:02.669-04:00I agree with the previous commenters which is also...I agree with the previous commenters which is also why I think the price to move up 3 spots may not be that expensive.<br /><br />I think it was Gord Wilson who suggested the possiblity of bundling Ottawa's pick plus one of their second round picks in order to move up. Maybe that's on the low end but I'd say Regin, Weircoch, and the 6th pick would be way too high a price to pay.Anshunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post-7492419656315927192011-04-14T14:29:26.621-04:002011-04-14T14:29:26.621-04:00@ Anon - Amen ... well said! The player chosen 6t...@ Anon - Amen ... well said! The player chosen 6th has just as much a chance to be a star as the the player picked 3rd. The player chosen 3rd also has just as much a chance to be a dud as the the player picked 6th. BM shouldn't gamble away assets on what is already a gamble.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9215652504344172254.post-70005380858227032022011-04-14T13:57:33.779-04:002011-04-14T13:57:33.779-04:00I like Landeskog, the little I've seen of him....I like Landeskog, the little I've seen of him.<br /><br />That said, I hope that the Sens just stay where they are and take the best player they can get. Many scouts I've heard on the various talk shows talk about how drafting at 5 or 6 may may still get you the bes player in the draft.<br /><br />Look at Skinner this year. Wasn't he drafted 7th?<br /><br />The point is that it's a crapshoot, and you just never know. Now, if this year's draft had an absolute can't miss like Stamkos, then that's a different story.<br /><br />But, given the fact that Huberdeau, Strome, or Couturier might be still available at 6th, why not save your assets. After all, I think what you do with the player after the draft is just as important, if not more important.<br /><br />This organization turned Alfie, Hossa, Havlat ... even Chara into real good players by allowing them to develop and grow. I think that under good management, any of those top guys could work out for us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com